The company is formed, the account is the hard part. Why banks at home decline foreign structures, why fintechs are no permanent answer, and where company accounts really open.


It is one of the most common scenarios in our consultations: the US LLC is formed, the English Ltd registered, the company in Dubai set up, and then the real odyssey begins. Banks at home say no, often without giving a reason. EU fintechs open quickly, but freeze the account after three months for a "routine review". And suddenly a working company has no working bank account. Opening the account is today the hardest part of a structure abroad, not forming the company. Whoever knows that in advance plans differently and saves months. The broader overview of business accounts abroad is in our complete overview; this article goes deeper into the special case of the foreign company.
The refusal rarely has anything to do with you or your business. It has to do with the bank's internal compliance arithmetic, and that is quickly explained.
Higher checking effort: with a foreign company, the bank must verify register extracts, shareholder structure and beneficial owners from a foreign jurisdiction, often with apostilles, certified translations and external databases. That is expensive, slow and error-prone.
Higher compliance risk: structures abroad sit under general suspicion with regulators. For the bank that means more checks, more documentation, more liability risk if it gets something wrong. The cost-benefit ratio is negative for the bank as long as you are not a major client.
No client loyalty: anyone who wants an account for a US LLC is usually not a core client of the high-street bank. No loan, no mortgage, no pension. For the bank, you are pure compliance effort with no revenue potential.
The result: refusal, often without a reason, because a reason in turn creates compliance effort. That is not a failure of your company but a structural problem of the banking systems at home, in London as much as in Stockholm or Oslo.
The quick answer to bank refusals is called Revolut Business, Wise, Airwallex or similar. For many scenarios that is a sensible interim solution. But not a permanent one. The problems are structural.
No deposit protection: fintechs without a banking licence hold your money as safeguarded funds, not as a bank deposit. In the UK, the FCA states plainly that money held with payment and e-money firms is not protected by the FSCS. In an insolvency you are a creditor, not a depositor with a guaranteed claim. For operating accounts with larger balances that is a real risk.
Compliance freezes: fintechs open quickly and check thoroughly afterwards. The pattern is familiar: the account runs for three months, then an "enhanced due diligence" request arrives, and if the answer is not perfect or the transaction looks unusual, the account is frozen. Sometimes for good. With the money inside.
Limited acceptance: many banks and authorities do not accept fintech account details for every purpose. Salary payments, tax accounts, direct debit mandates: this is where fintechs regularly hit their limits.
The right role for fintechs: fast payments, currency conversion, backup account. Not: the only company account. More on our page on neobanks.
The honest answer: outside the EU, at banks that can and want to deal with international structures. From our portfolio, the following work particularly well for company accounts: Georgia, where banks open accounts for foreign companies too, with a pragmatic process and multi-currency accounts in EUR, USD and GEL. Serbia, with solid banks that can handle international ownership structures, well suited to operating accounts with EUR payments towards the EU. And depending on company type and business model, further jurisdictions from Armenia to Asian locations for trading and e-commerce structures. The full overview of our offer for companies is on the page Business.
Which bank accepts which company form differs considerably: a US LLC is assessed differently from a UK Ltd, an Emirates free zone company differently from an Estonian OÜ. This detailed knowledge changes monthly, and that is exactly what our service is for: we know which bank is opening what this week.
One point almost everyone overlooks, although it is decisive for discretion: for a business account, the CRS reports not only the company. For passive entities, that is, those with a holding character and mainly investment income, banks also report the controlling persons to their respective country of residence, meaning you personally. An active operating company, by contrast, is reported only at company level. Anyone seeking discretion at company level too must therefore think about jurisdiction and company type together. The basics are explained in CRS explained, the current reporting map in Non-CRS countries 2026.
So that you can judge the effort, here is the standard pack that reputable banks outside the EU expect for a company account. On the company: a current register extract (Certificate of Incorporation or Good Standing, depending on the jurisdiction no older than three to six months), the articles of association or operating agreement, and evidence of the shareholder structure down to the natural person. On the people: passport and a second document for every beneficial owner and authorised signatory, in some cases with an apostille. On the business: a comprehensible description of the business model, expected payment flows (volumes, countries, typical counterparties) and, depending on the bank, first contracts or invoices as evidence of real activity. Whoever presents this pack complete and free of contradictions shortens the opening by weeks. Whoever pieces it together produces follow-up questions, and every follow-up question is a new opportunity for refusal. A large part of our work consists simply of making this pack bank-ready before the bank sees it.
Mistake one: form first, think about banking later. The company form and the jurisdiction of incorporation largely decide which banks come into question at all. Whoever plans the banking only after forming the company occasionally forms a structure for which there is simply no sensible account. The right order: check the banking options, then form the company.
Mistake two: the account abroad with home-country account details. Wanting a UK sort code and account number, or a Swedish or Norwegian account number, for the foreign company describes a contradiction in itself: domestic account details mean a domestic account, under domestic enforcement, domestic compliance and domestic de-banking, exactly what the structure abroad was meant to avoid. Thanks to SEPA, the country code of an IBAN is irrelevant for transfers in euros anyway; customers and suppliers pay into a Lithuanian or Serbian EUR IBAN just as smoothly. Where individual business partners hesitate, that is a conversation to have, not a structural problem.
Mistake three: everything in one account. For an operating company, the redundancy rule applies twice over: at least two independent banking relationships, ideally in different jurisdictions, plus a fintech for fast payments if needed. A single account freeze must never be able to bring the whole company to a halt.
Here too, the plain truth you rarely read at the usual formation providers: a foreign company that is in fact run from your home country can be taxed there. In the UK, a company incorporated abroad is UK resident if its central management and control is exercised in the UK, a principle HMRC traces back to the De Beers case; it can also have a taxable permanent establishment there. Then the profits are taxable at home, and the finest account abroad changes nothing about that. The business account abroad solves your banking problem, not your tax set-up. Confusing the two is the most expensive mistake in this area. Whoever wants to clarify the structure speaks to specialised tax advisers; whoever wants to clarify the banking speaks to us. In that order.
Business accounts follow the same process as personal accounts: you choose the destination, we accompany the opening, from assembling the documents through the forms to communication with the bank, in most cases completely remotely. Typical duration: one to four weeks depending on the country and company form. The details are on the page How it works.
How long does the opening realistically take? With a complete document pack, between one and four weeks, depending on the country and the company type. Without a complete pack: indefinitely, because every request for more documents puts you back in the compliance department's queue.
Does my company need substance in the bank's country? No. Unlike banks at home, the banks we work with expect no local business activity; they expect a comprehensible structure and plausible payment flows. Questions of substance arise for tax, not for the bank, and belong with your tax adviser.
Can I make normal SEPA payments with the account abroad? Yes, provided the bank is connected to the SEPA area or runs EUR accounts with suitable correspondent routes; that is one of our selection criteria. Payments outside the euro area run through SWIFT, as at any other bank.
What does a company account outside the EU cost? More than a basic business account at home and less than you fear: expect opening and account fees in the mid range. In return you get something your structure simply cannot get in the EU: an account that opens and stays open.
Not sure which jurisdiction accepts your company form?
That is exactly what the free consultation is for: a short conversation, an honest answer, even if it is: "Your structure needs a different fix first before an account makes sense."
Note: This article is not tax, legal or investment advice. For individual tax questions, speak to a qualified tax adviser.